Protocol Comparison
Compare smart lock communication protocols side-by-side to find the best fit for your needs
Quick Decision Guide
Best Battery Life
Zigbee — up to 18 months
Easiest Setup
Wi-Fi — no hub required
Most Reliable
Z-Wave — dedicated frequency
Future-Proof
Thread — Matter compatible
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | Z-Wave | Zigbee | Wi-Fi | Thread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 908 MHz | 2.4 GHz | 2.4/5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Range | 40m | 20m | 30m | 30m |
| Battery Life | 12 months | 18 months | 6 months | 12+ months |
| Latency | <100ms | <50ms | <200ms | <50ms |
| Max Nodes | 232 | 65,000 | Varies | 250+ |
| Security | S2 AES-128 | AES-128 | WPA3 | DTLS |
| Hub Required | Yes | Yes | No | Border Router |
| Price Range | $$ | $ | $$$ | $$ |
Pros & Cons
Z-Wave
Advantages
- Low power consumption
- No WiFi interference
- Excellent mesh routing
- Dedicated frequency band
Limitations
- Hub required
- Limited bandwidth
- Lower node density
- Proprietary protocol
Zigbee
Advantages
- Massive node support
- Low power
- Fast response
- Cost-effective
Limitations
- WiFi interference potential
- Hub required
- Shorter range
- Complex mesh management
Wi-Fi
Advantages
- No hub needed
- Easy setup
- Remote access built-in
- Wide compatibility
Limitations
- High power consumption
- Network congestion
- Shorter battery life
- Security concerns
Thread
Advantages
- Matter compatible
- Self-healing mesh
- Low power
- IP-based
Limitations
- Newer technology
- Limited devices
- Border router needed
- Evolving standard
Need Help Deciding?
Try our Protocol Selection Wizard for a personalized recommendation